Mesmerizing Medicine
In the first half of the 16th century, the great anatomist Vesalius noted that Hippocrates did no dissection, at all, and Galen did his on monkeys. In other words, they might be wrong. He shortly went about proving that they were.
News of this catastrophe spread like…glass (which, if you know your physics, is actually a fluid, and therefore even slower than molasses).
In 1628 William Harvey published his “De Moto Cordis” (On the Motion of the Heart and the Blood), which established the circulatory system in its modern form and dealt the old Greek concept of the humors its death blow. Except no one noticed.
Thus, the stage was set for the introduction of another humor, in addition to the time honored black bile, yellow bile, phlegm and blood. This one was brand new, yet another product of the poorly understood discovery of magnetism.
Enter Franz Anton Mesmer, a physician who published his doctoral thesis in 1776 on the effect of the planets on the human body (although, to be fair, he may have plagiarized it). Mesmer was convinced that the body contained a fluid he called “animal magnetism.” This was responsible for all disease, of any type. If one could just figure out how to control it, one could cure anyone of anything.
And guess who had figured out how to control it?
Mesmer’s early experiments were on a young woman with a variety of somatic complaints. In the old days, she would have been considered a “hysteric.” In modern parlance, she was probably neurotic, or suffering from a somatiform conversion disorder. Lay folks might call her a hypochondriac (another great word from Ancient Greece). Regardless, he fixed her round with some magnets and waved his hands and, ouila! she was cured.
He eventually discovered that he didn’t need the magnets at all. He could accomplish the same thing with the simple force of his magnetic personality, accompanied by a variety of showman’s tricks.
Mesmer did raise some eyebrows among the medical establishment, who were so far advanced that they were still using bloodletting to treat just about everything, even though the humoral theory of disease had been discredited a full hundred years before. But they were pretty sure Mesmer was a charlatan, anyway. He at least wasn’t behaving like a gentleman doctor.
Mesmer ran into trouble in Vienna when he attempted to cure an opera musician of her blindness. He was certain he had cured her; the medical men of Vienna were just as sure that she was as blind as ever.
So Mesmer headed to that great credulous city of Paris, where he set up shop. He did marvelously, curing various and sundry folks of many different ailments, including some of the rich and famous (most famously, the hero of the American Revolution, the Marquis de Lafayette). Soon he was so busy that he had to invent a group healing system, wherein a bunch of ailing folks sat around a baquet–an iron contraption holding previously “magnetized” water.
He also aroused the ire of the Faculte of the Royal Medical Society.
The Faculte wanted Mesmer shut down. Unfortunately, one of their number, a physician named d’Eison, had been won over. D’Eison proposed what might very well have been the first randomized clinical trial in history. A group of sufferers would be randomly assigned to receive either Mesmer’s therapy or conventional therapy. Results would be compared when the trial was over.
(Lest we think this is in any way modern, let us remember that this proposal was for all comers, regardless of disease. Plus, Mesmer would perform his cure without divulging his secrets.)
The Faculte declined, and ousted d’Eison, who, having been made privy to Mesmer’s methods during the battle for acceptance, promptly opened up his own shop to dispense the same cure. Mesmer, annoyed and insulted, appealed to Queen Marie Antoinette for support.
What he got was the attention of Louis XVI, who was known for being meticulous about his science. He appointed a commission to evaluate Mesmer’s methods. The members of the commission read like a who’s who of science in pre-Revolutionary France, most notably including Lavoisier, the celebrated chemist, Bailly, the astronomer, Guillotin (the doctor who proposed the contraption that would eventually kill Lavoisier, Bailly and Louis), and America’s Ben Franklin, who was serving as Ambassador from the new republic.
The panel investigated Mesmer by observing d’Eison. They found no evidence of magnetic activity in the baquet (surprise!), nor did they feel anything special when he magnetized them. They then attempted to apply his methods themselves. Their patient population included an asthmatic, a blind man, a tuberculous patient, and several other minor ailments. None showed improvement. They even went so far as to attempt to magnetize a tree in Franklin’s yard, and see if a teenage farm hand could pick out which one. He picked out four trees, not one of them magnetized.
The commission declared Mesmer to be a total fraud. They blamed his “cures” on a combination of hysterics, suggestion, and the as-yet-unknown, but rather well described in their report, placebo effect. It didn’t help when one of his most famous cures died during a session, or when the famous blind musician gave a concert in Paris, still blind.
Mesmer left Paris with his tail between his legs.
His legacy, however, is still hotly debated. The hypnotists hail him as the (largely unwitting) pioneer of their field. Most scientists just pass him off as yet another of the charismatic quacks of the 18th century, pointing to an interview given late in his life,when he claimed he had magnetized the sun. Charcot and Freud saw him as laying the foundations for their study of hysteria.
Hysteria, which comes from the Greek word, hustera, meaning “uterus.” Which brings us back, full circle, to Hippocrates.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!Related posts:
- Sacerdotal Medicine
- Is that Queen Victoria on your Medicine Bottle?
- Medicine Goes Dark
- At the Salpetriere
- There’s a Bed for That!
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


![[del.icio.us]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[kirtsy]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/kirtsy.png)
![[MySpace]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)




14 Comments
Dr. Grumpy
Friday, 4th June 2010 at 8:35 am
Mesmerizing post.
[Reply]
ck Replies:
June 4th, 2010 at 9:27 am
I second that.
I know I’ve said this before, but I hope you’re compiling this into a book. You make this information so interesting.
[Reply]
mira
Friday, 4th June 2010 at 11:15 am
So I’m guessing the stuff they sell these days with magnets in it and claim that it heals or helps with arthritis, etc. is also bunk? That theory seems to have stuck around a bit longer than the other humors. I wonder why?
I also wonder why we’re so much better at accepting changes in scientific learning now than back then, or are we? I know some people believe everything that comes down the pike but overall we have become a society that encourages scientific theory and challenging old modes of thought, haven’t we? Or am i wrong? Certainly some doctors are stuck with old thinking and don’t like being told they’re wrong…
[Reply]
Dr. Dad Replies:
June 4th, 2010 at 11:42 am
Penn and Teller did a very funny episode on Bull S*it on magnets. Pretty pathetic that something that was discredited 230 years ago is still being touted today. Oh, but you see, we have MUCH better magnets today!
[Reply]
themother Replies:
June 4th, 2010 at 12:37 pm
I think you’ve hit on the basic idea of the scientific paradigm, coined and popularized by Thomas Kuhn in the 1960s. Kuhn theorized that each generation of scientists is indoctrinated, during their training, with the current scientific paradigm. When radical new ideas show up, they often have to wait for the old guard to die out before they get their full due.
We science types like to believe that we are immune from prejudice, and will follow the evidence. But radical ideas are often so far out of the knowledge base (remember how Einstein felt about quantum) that it’s very hard for our old brains to play nice with new tricks.
[Reply]
themother Replies:
June 4th, 2010 at 12:38 pm
And, yes, there’s no evidence that those magnetic things work any better than placebo. Which means that that’s what they are. So are the copper bracelets, regardless of what my MIL thinks.
[Reply]
Stephanie
Friday, 4th June 2010 at 11:45 am
So what makes a medical charlatan historically noteworthy? Success (financially)? Influence? Originality? Or the methods used to debunk him/her?
[Reply]
themother Replies:
June 4th, 2010 at 12:41 pm
There have, obviously, been thousands of snake oil salesmen in every generation. What makes them historically noteworthy?
Popularity. Scandal. Historical influence.
Mesmer had all three going for him, especially the last one. Writers of serious textbooks of psychology and neurology still very often include a chapter on Mesmer. He started something. What is often harder to pin down.
[Reply]
Mrs.Mayhem
Friday, 4th June 2010 at 12:51 pm
Every time I read one of your Friday posts, I am glad to be alive today instead of when all of this was occurring. Ironically enough, my aunt recommended magnet therapy for a sore wrist not too long ago. Too funny. Hard to believe educated people still believe this stuff.
[Reply]
Robert the Skeptic
Friday, 4th June 2010 at 1:54 pm
…each generation of scientists is indoctrinated, during their training, with the current scientific paradigm. When radical new ideas show up, they often have to wait for the old guard to die out before they get their full due.
My father-in-law is a retired professor of agriculture, climate science is obviously of significance in that field. He attended a lecture in the 1970′s (and bought the guy’s book) where he learned that the Greenland ice cores predicted cycles of global heating and cool. All fine, but he is tenaciously holding onto the belief that the global warming trend we are having now was predicted back then – BUT it will shift back into a cooling trend and we will enter another ice age.
What bothers me about my discussions with my father-in-law is that it seems what he learned back then is “stuck” in his thinking, and no amount of new science is going to dissuade him from rejecting the theory of anthropogenetic climate change. I am frustrated by unscientific and bias thinking from someone whose career was as a scientist. Indeed, he will likely die believing he missed the next great Ice Age. Sad.
[Reply]
Lawyer Mom
Saturday, 5th June 2010 at 9:25 pm
Interesting. Is histrionic a derivative of hysteria?
[Reply]
themother Replies:
June 6th, 2010 at 8:15 am
Yep. Just another relic of the days when our uteri roamed free to ravage the world.
[Reply]
Michele - The Professional Family Manager
Sunday, 6th June 2010 at 10:01 pm
I live near Ithaca, New York, where there are all kinds of “healers” using magnets to cure everything. Anyone who does not believe they work are simply “brainwashed” by the medical establishment.
By the way, my oldest daughter has started reading your blog. I think her biology teacher is impressed that my daughter can regale people with what she’s learning from you. So, thank you for providing the education I wish my daughter could get in school…and the education I wish I had when I went to school.
[Reply]
Domestically Challenged
Monday, 7th June 2010 at 1:05 pm
I used to work with a Doc who swore by magnets. She got into a ton of trouble w/ the state board after she started Rxing (selling) said magnets to pts in lieu of traditional tx.
“Ok, now try to pull down my arms (held over her head)” Couldn’t do it. “Now, put on this magnet necklace and try again!” Amazingly her arms came right down. Why? Because Magnets give us superpowers!!!!
[Reply]
Leave a Comment