Graverobbers R Us (but if we can’t find the right corpses…)
Medicine has a long (several thousand year) history of graverobbing.
You see, for most of the history of medicine, examining actual bodies has been considered, well, sacrilege. And that didn’t even come from the monotheistic tradition (although the Torah made the rules about dealing with the dead very clear)–it dates all the way back as far as history can reach. Dead people were treated with respect, even by Neanderthals.
So what is a good medical scholar to do?
Hippocrates didn’t do dissections. He relied, apparently, on battlefield injuries for his anatomy. Galen dissected pigs. And monkeys. We all know how many hilarious bits of inaccuracies crept into obstetrics and gynecology from this plan (and stuck for a couple thousand years. In fact, Vesalius, the great anatomist of the Renaissance, was roundly critiqued by his contemporaries for disagreeing with the mighty Galen).
Serious docs who wanted to understand real human anatomy dug it up.
While the stories of Renaissance artists huddling in basements over illicit corpses may not be entirely accurate (there is some disagreement as to whether the Church outright banned human dissection or just really, really discouraged it), Vesalius WAS forced to flee to the Ottoman Empire to avoid the Inquisition. Regardless, we can definitively state that there weren’t a whole lot of available subjects, legitimately, that is. Graveyards, though, were full of ‘em.
The profession of graverobbing, nicely delineated in Dickens, was very lucrative. All those Enlightenment gentleman scientists (no one could afford to be a scientist unless he had an independent income) were willing to pay handsomely for a well-preserved anatomical specimen.
Britain, in the 18th century, attempted to stem this heinous practice by making the corpses of executed prisoners available to medical schools and physicians. But the execution rate dropped as the Enlightenment took hold, leaving a gap between supply and demand. This gap was most embarrassingly filled in 1828 Edinburgh by Burke and Hare, two enterprising Irishmen. They murdered 17 people and sold the corpses to Dr. Knox, the anatomy lecturer at Edinburgh Medical College.
The obstetric anatomist was at an even greater disadvantage. Very few convicted murderers happened to be pregnant. Funny how that worked.
In the mid-eighteenth century, William Hunter and William Smellie each published very detailed anatomical atlases of the gravid uterus. They were landmark publications, on the shelf of every physician through the early part of the 20th century. They were hailed as the first man-midwives to put the Enlightenment ideals to use in the brand new science of obstetrics.
No one asked where they got the bodies. Until now.
Historian Don Shelton has analyzed the dissection drawings in these publications and come up with the astounding number of 35-40 women. And pointed out that it was rather rare for a woman 8-9 months pregnant to just up and die of natural causes, even in 18th century England. Dying in childbirth, yes. Pre-delivery, not so much.
He’s pretty sure that the two anatomical rivals procured their dissection material by paying for the murders of young, pregnant country girls who arrived in London in pursuit of a better life. Who’d miss them in the big city? They used them to experiment with that tricky C-section, and get better anatomy at the same time.
Just another time honored tradition.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!Related posts:
- Algebra, Alchemy and Albucasis
- Medicine Goes Dark
- Dawn
- The Glory that was Rome
- You Say Hysteria, I Say…???
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

![[del.icio.us]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[kirtsy]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/kirtsy.png)
![[MySpace]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)




9 Comments
Mira
Friday, 12th February 2010 at 5:11 pm
Another reason to be glad I'm pregnant now. I guess I'd be a great target, all full term and still walking around. Amazing how the church stifled learning and still does really. I guess a more educated populace is less willing to believe in the outright authority of a group of people who think there's only one right way to be. Hmmm…
[Reply]
domesticallyChlnged
Friday, 12th February 2010 at 9:49 pm
Bloody Hell, indeed. It amazes me that medicine was able to get to the point where it is today, despite Europe's historical influence.
Ok, I have a question for you. One that NOBODY has ever been able to answer for me, including Google… Perhaps you will know…. Fast forward to modern day, do you know how they do those intrauterine videos and pics we use now? The ones showing EVERYTHING from intercourse through birth? How do they do that??? And when they just open and push back the chorion to get the picture, when and how did they figure out to do that w/o causing harm? Thank gawd we no longer have to rob graves!
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
February 16th, 2010 at 7:29 pm
The process of taking those photos is called fetoscopy–Wikipedia has a page on it. Basically, an incision is made in the abdomen and a small catheter containing a fiberoptic camera is pushed into the amniotic sac. This same approach is used for surgical intervention, when necessary.
[Reply]
domesticallyChlnged Replies:
February 18th, 2010 at 6:04 pm
Doh! (facepalm) Such a simple answer, you ROCK!
I had r/o fetoscopy on the grounds that I couldn't imagine a woman with micro cam sewn in for a good year, as in the case of making a video such as The Miricle of Life showing ovulation through birth. Enter in Facepalm #2… (note to self) seriously? You thought it was the same subject through out?
[Reply]
Stephanie B
Saturday, 13th February 2010 at 1:55 am
Charming.
[Reply]
Momisodes
Saturday, 13th February 2010 at 4:12 am
Yikes. That just sent chills down my very pregnant uterus.
[Reply]
Lawyer Mom
Monday, 15th February 2010 at 12:48 am
Super creepy! Super-duper creepy!
[Reply]
Stepiphany
Monday, 15th February 2010 at 1:04 pm
I shouldn't have read this while eating breakfast. I was thinking maybe Jack the Ripper was actually a brilliant medical mind and just collecting data. ICK. Gives another reason for women to be "confined" to their homes in the last trimester.
[Reply]
xax
Tuesday, 2nd March 2010 at 3:26 am
good website!
[Reply]
Leave a Comment