To Science, or Not to Science
I ran across this study this weekend. A bunch of kids in 7th grade (11 and 12) were polled about future career choices. The results were tabulated against parents’ careers, and the student’s own later education. The results show that kids in the 11 and 12 year age range have a pretty good idea of what they want to do with their lives.
I find this terrifying. Not because kids know what they want out of their lives, but because, if it’s true? Science doesn’t have shot. Math, either.
How many 11 year olds have had a chance to fall in love with science? How many haven’t been turned off by math?
Neither is taught well in our schools. School boards are under constant bombardment about religious issues in science education, but the real issue is this: we teach science as a memorization course. We should be teaching it as a wonderment course.
Forget Boyle’s Law and Newton’s Laws and the conservation of matter. Who wants to memorize another law? This isn’t law school.
Why can’t we teach kids how COOL science is? Teach them the fun stuff. There’s plenty of time later for them to learn the laws that govern their particular specialty. We have to get them into science, first.
And math–why do we have to inflict proofs on middle schoolers? For gods’ sakes. Only serious theoretical mathematicians do proofs. 11 year olds don’t need that frustration. Why do we intentionally turn them off like that? Geometry could be a way cool course if they didn’t have to deal with those damn proofs. Let’s start with flat triangles, and then blow their minds and introduce them to non-Euclidean geometry. No, triangles don’t ALWAYS add up to 180 degrees. It kind of depends on where you are. And where the triangle is.
Biology–is there a point to memorizing a thousand different phyla? I AM a biologist, and I don’t remember all the phyla. That’s what the gods invented reference manuals for. Let’s teach them about DNA, and forensics, and genetics. Cool stuff. [And of course, evolution. Biology only makes sense in terms of evolution. It's one of those damn COOL things.]
Physics–for crying out loud, how often do you need to calculate the trajectory of an arrow in real life? I mean, that might have been useful back in the days of longbows in battle, but I’m guessing they didn’t have hand held calculators back then.
[Ever see the movie "Gettysburg?" The Union soldiers spend a decent amount of the battle calculating the trajectories of their canons. By hand. They still missed. The Engineer loved that scene.]
Let’s teach them the mysteries of quantum and the mind-blowing awesomeness of special relativity and the majesty of the universe and the missingness of dark matter. Let them play in the lab with springs and pendulums and make predictions. Forget the calculations. There’s plenty of time to learn those.
Chemistry–the periodic table is AWESOME. Teach them about Mendelev and his illicit bigamy while he played with the elements. Teach them about Newton and his closet alchemy. Lavoisier and how he lost his head in the French Revolution. Teach them to follow the bouncing electrons as they make molecules come and go and reassemble. Let them explore entropy as it pertains to their own rooms. WHY do they have to memorize the stuff you can find on any periodic table in the world? Just to make them miserable?
Why do we turn our youngsters off so early? Like, right when they’re making up their minds about what they want to do with their lives. Here, kid–here’s forty pages worth of problems. Isn’t science fun?
No wonder science literacy is at an all time low. No wonder stupidity like the anti-vax movement and the 2012 mythology keeps popping up. Did you know that NASA has actually launched an education movement to stop the lunacy?
I think it’s about time we recalculated our educational trajectory. We seem to be missing the point. And the kids.
And then, I ran into this study. Apparently, the key to preventing teenage pregnancy is to keep kids interested in school. Funny, I always thought it was sex ed and condoms. WAIT–maybe that’s the same thing???
Seems like we can kill two birds with the same stone. Not that killing birds is the goal of any education program, but getting a new generation of non-pregnant scientists should certainly top the list.
UPDATE: Eskeptic has an article today from Dr. Clark Lindgren (Grinell College), talking about setting up a curriculum very much like the one I would love to see in high school. His experience is in college, but exactly the same thing could be done with younger folks. Go read it.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!Related posts:
- The Great Texas Science Panic
- Science and the Death of Helicopter Parenting
- The Law of Time
- She Blinded Me with “Science”
- The ABCs of Homeschooling, or Why I Have an Ulcer
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

![[del.icio.us]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[kirtsy]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/kirtsy.png)
![[MySpace]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://mothershandbook.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)




24 Comments
Stephanie B
Tuesday, 17th November 2009 at 9:05 pm
Call me the choir. I'm so with you.
Not sure about delving into quantum physics. For it to mean anything, the math is obnoxious. However, astronomy and orbital mechanics is a great way to learn classical mechanics. There's so much information out there. Biology, you bet. Something else that's cool is to make some MacGuyver-type contraptions: solar still, sand filter, windmill, etc. And the HISTORY of science, how people discovered what they did – too often that's a mystery so people don't realize what goes into making it. Great stuff!
Going to split this up.
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 17th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Quantum, though, is fun because it explains how much we can't explain. Nothing like adding a little uncertainty to science education. We might be able to avert some of that dogmatic stuff that tends to infiltrate the science world.
[Reply]
Stephanie B
Tuesday, 17th November 2009 at 9:11 pm
What I would LOVE to see in math, rather than endless years of repetitive arithmetic and formula memorization is something is focusing on word problems – now don't groan! – because the reason we do math is to solve life's problems. If you can't see the connection between math and the real world, you'll never understand why you're doing it. I'd love to do that with geometry…figuring how much water goes under the bridge, how many shingles you're going to need, how much paint for the walls.
And I knew I wanted to write fiction at twelve and never considered engineering or science. Just goes to show you what you can become by accident.
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 17th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
LOVE word problems. Use them all the time when I'm teaching.
What's that old cliche? Kid doesn't understand fractions until you explain them in terms of divying up a pizza or a cake? Suddenly, it makes sense.
[Reply]
Dr. Dad
Tuesday, 17th November 2009 at 9:11 pm
Agree completely. Unfortunately, look who's teaching. If the teacher doesn't have the education to grasp the greatness of sciences, how do we expect the kids to? This country also feeds to the masses, so the few that really enjoy science will be held back with the rest of the crowd.
These studies you cite are from England, where, as in other countries (unlike the US), kids are not taught to the lowest common denominator. I'd bet the same study in the US would yield dramatically different results.
The big problem is no one is willing to step up and say, "y'know, we've been doing it this way for years (and years, and years), and maybe we ought to completely revamp our curriculum. Also, if a student doesn't want to get a higher education, we should allow them to go to trade school and then go out and get a job. They do that in many countries and it opens up the schools to kids who really want to learn.
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 17th, 2009 at 9:26 pm
Unfortunately, you're right. The average middle to high school science/math teacher does not understand her subject well enough to make it fun. Add to that they way they get defensive when a kid questions and probes, and you have a recipe for disaster.
[Reply]
Lawyer Mom
Tuesday, 17th November 2009 at 9:20 pm
Have you got room for one more student in your home school?
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 17th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
Yep. Send him down.
[Reply]
Mrsbear
Tuesday, 17th November 2009 at 9:42 pm
I remember hating math during high school, then taking it later in college (as an adult) I found it so much less painful. Granted I took it as an open college course, where I basically read the material and went in for testing. But it was really almost fun to work out on my own. I know the drilling my kids have to do with some of their math and science can get so redundant and exhausting, they develop this "I hate math" mentality that becomes almost like a mantra, they want to quit before they even begin.
[Reply]
Catherine
Tuesday, 17th November 2009 at 10:08 pm
Standing and applauding!!! I decided to do a Crime Scene Investigation science program with my 6th grade son this year, but haven't gotten around to most of the experiments because of the pesky migraines. So, I looked through our shelves and realized that we have lots of biographies of scientists which are right at his reading level. Introduce the science in a historical context with a story – talk about a win!! Keep preaching!
[Reply]
Sarah Blue
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 12:18 am
Together with three other ladies, we taught our boys preschool last year. One lady taught letters & numbers, another sight words. When it was my turn, we made volcanoes, added Mentos to bottles of soda and tried not to get wet, watced the trees in my garden grow flowers that turned into tiny fruits which we later picked and ate, made goop and a bunch of other fun stuff. They had a blast. And months later still remembered the names for the different parts of the tree, although they all had trouble remembering the volcano ingredients. Silly boys kept confusing baking soda and baking powder. We also baked cookies one day and messed with the ingredients. What happens if you leave out the eggs? What happens if you forget the flour? Not many people realize that baking is science and a fantastic way to illustrate chemistry to little ones…And Delicious!
[Reply]
Becca
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 12:41 am
When I was in school I hated math. I hated it so much that I did everything I could to avoid it. It is still one of my least favorite memories with every member of my family trying to help me. It was just awful. I was very thankful that I didn't have to take it after pre-algebra because I could do band and drama and choir.
Anyway, my point is now I can't help my kids with math because I still totally suck at it. And that makes me feel really bad. So… I guess I wish I had paid more attention and listened to my Dad and done better in math.
[Reply]
Sarah Blue
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 1:16 am
I also agree with Dr. Dad. I would love to see the public schools curriculum revamped. I didn't study math and science in college beyond the general requirements. I studied people. And people do not do well sitting in a class seven hours a day being lectured on any subject. Especially elementary kids…which is where science needs to be taught. People learn by doing. By doing and screwing up and figuring out how to do better. They learn when they get their hands dirty and play. I once read that it's useless to teach a child to read unless they have a base on which to understand the things they are reading. You can have a child read a story about a forest, but until they've actually seen a forest, they will not understand. You can teach the elements, but unless you can see and understand how they work together to form everything, you just won't comprehend or remember.
Sorry to ramble on so. I'm usually just a lurker, nodding my head in agreement to your views on math and science and cringing as I read your history of women's medical treatment and thanking my lucky stars I wasn't alive back then.
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Glad to hear from you. Sometimes I wonder if I have only the twelve usual commentators reading my blog. I love to hear from lurkers. Especially when they agree with me.
[Reply]
Paula
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 4:54 am
Great post! I'm in agreement. Unfortunately, most schools now have to perform well on standardized tests in order to receive funding from the government, so until the standardized tests are changed, I fear the curriculum in most schools doesn't stand a chance. Although there are many science and math teachers who aren't very adept at or enthusiastic about their subject, I think there are just as many fabulous teachers whose hands are tied by the mandates of their school district and state. Today, the curriculum is so prescribed for most teachers that there is little to no room for anything "extra." My husband teaches HS math and is fortunate to be in a magnet school where they can really go above and beyond the average math curricula. He is a huge believer that the thought process behind the math is more important than being able to do algorithms. Fortunately, our boys have grown up with a love for math and science; I just hope it continues!
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 18th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
You make an excellent point. I don't think, however, the two goals are completely incompatible.
The SAT and ACT, while reviled by kids and educators alike, are proven again and again to be excellent predictors of college success. That said, neither has much science–the ACT has a section they select out as science-ability, but it's all reasoning and logic, which is, of course, what I would love to see taught. As for math–the highest either test goes is Alg II. Most kids who are into serious science (ie, not turned off by the curriculum so far) are doing calculus in high school, so they've already seriously internalized the kinds of stuff that show up on the standardized tests (any kid in calculus can turn a triangle inside out in seconds)–plus they're three years out from geometry and algebra, so most of them go back and brush up.
Ask college profs about high school science ed, though, and you won't hear them praising the SAT or the ACT. PZ Meyers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba2h9tqNYAo) talks about having to retrain his freshmen from their biology mis-education. Brian Greene devoted an entire section of The Elegant Universe (http://www.amazon.com/Elegant-Universe-Superstrin... to a proposal for how to teach physics in high school–and his ideas are a lot like mine. Or mine are like his, more likely.
[Reply]
Michele Renee Replies:
November 20th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
I was going to write a post exactly like Paula's about what administrators are telling teachers: it's all about the test scores. And not just nat'l tests…it's all the local ones too. I have two sons in middle school and one in 3rd grade. The number of tests they take is truly a turn off to them and us. Besides the SAT and ACT the kids are bombarded with tests in elementary and middle schools in our district and parents really need to show up at council meetings to voice this. Teachers have to teach to the tests in our area. You will get a few renegades like my Hubs who will say who cares and provide a lesson from when things were different. It makes him feel good too (one has to feel bad for the younger teachers who only know this new way of having to teach for the test). Or my 6th grader's current science teacher who is passionate with hands on labs. But the work load for my kids is incredible. And let's not forget at age 11 many still have a stuffed animal on their bed. I say screw the career aptitude tests for my 11 yr old. Recently we have realized we wouldn't blink an eye if our sons wanted to delay college to follow a passion.
[Reply]
Mira
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 5:56 pm
It's not just math and science being taught poorly, when I was getting my masters in ed and student teaching US history I was disappointed to find that surprising my students with a short answer section on their history test (which was usually all multiple choice date memorization) completely stumped the HONORS students. Teaching history as a series of dates is truly missing the fascinating narratives and learning from past mistakes and deep analysis of policy choices made by governments and so on and so forth. Couldn't even answer in 2 words a question they knew the answer to if given in multiple choice format. Think that information stuck?
And not to be a PITA, Grinnell has two 'n's please. Twas my undergrad and while I never took a course from that teacher, I'm sure proud to take some credit!
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 18th, 2009 at 9:58 pm
I totally apologize for the misspelling. I was in a hurry this morning. Mea culpa.
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 18th, 2009 at 9:59 pm
BTW, I totally agree on history, too. History is about motivation, not dates.
[Reply]
sara @ domestically challenged
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 1:00 pm
I get all depressed reading this, as I agree. Our schools are sorely behind in this. I wish, so badly, that we could do better. I see it every.single.day.
[Reply]
Margo
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 6:59 pm
I don't even know where to start. I think it's a general problem with many subjects, not just science and math. OUr educational system is so passive and completely anti-liberal arts; and even history curricula and teachers overall suck until college, unless you are an AP student. If we could get students fascinated by that, I think all kinds of good decisions regarding one's future could be made at 11 or 12.
[Reply]
The Dental Maven
Wednesday, 18th November 2009 at 7:21 pm
Here, Here! And in the words of Arthur C. Clark: “New ideas pass through three periods: 1) It can't be done. 2) It probably can be done, but it's not worth doing. 3) I knew it was a good idea all along!”
[Reply]
TheMother Replies:
November 18th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Love AC Clarke.
[Reply]
Leave a Comment